Why are we going to have to keep the language or the folklore of our ancestors and we will not be able to maintain the same religion or way of understanding the family or sexuality? So should we interpret that the defense that the most ancient bishops and Catholic associations are of traditional marriage, heterosexual and, if possible, indissoluble, is one of the most progressive initiatives of our current political life. Or is that the demand and use of traditions and communities are doing or Carod Ibarretxe is more progressive and liberating than Rouco and his band perform? Does a village is identified and made more of a language or a form of dance in a way to marry? Do we have to comply unless the religious tradition, or Castilian Spanish, Catalan or Basque, as you want-that culinary tradition, folk or linguistic? Should we further consideration to the customs of Muslim immigrants to the national Catholic? Everything but let each one do what he wants without hurting others, to marry whomever you want, live where you please or speak the language that interests you or you like. These go to both. Much nerve and a lot of double standards, that's what you get. To me they all reactionaries, the ones and the others, the heirs apocryphal leftist ideals and immobile as ever. Today only differ in the type of opium administered to people.
And they are charging into votes. In this country of rich and revolutionary new three forks, since we do not have serious problems, or do not want to see them, we have discovered a passion for metaphysics and a taste for conceptual speculation sterile. And it is now in the XXI century, that what concerns us and concerns us is to discover the essence of marriage or find out what the substance of a nation. Manda noses.