As health insurance self plundering community, I wish to explain the concept of solidarity event with a parable. Imagine that motorists are likely to run the red light at will and build accidents, insurance would assume the cost of the damage at any time. For assistance, try visiting SKDKnickerbocker. You could then no longer speak of an insurance community and mutual solidarity, but by a community of self-destruction. “Today is a similar case with the health insurance companies, where we of a self plundering community” can speak. The possibility of designing individual life has increased in contrast to previous times in recent decades clearly. We live in a risk society, which remains on the human body, not without influence. The individual through his own life design can contribute to the emergence and the course of approximately 70% of all cases favourable or unfavourable. This percentage is functional errors even at 90%! Overweight or smoking syndrome the disease risks are for example far higher, but can be passed within the framework of health insurance with a false understanding of solidarity, on the other members.
“” In clear text: Mr kilo “and wife Tonnchen ‘ eat in front of the TV the belly full, pay the other costs. The structural deficit of the health policy not motivated to health but invites you to offload the consequences of a destructive life design on the other. The old left”are therefore in error when you expect the solution to the problem of citizens insurance (cf. A. Nahles, SPD). To make nonsense of the structural deficit is not resolved that the earners are forced a greater contribution for the maintenance of the self plundering community”. “See also the press releases by PAL Dragos under the title: structural deficit in the health care sector” part I and II