Asbestos Situation

Veterans of the asbestos industry asbestos dedicated their working lives, many of them have even created chrysotile dynasty, leading to the production of children and grandchildren. Their life – the main evidence of safety of chrysotile asbestos in its controlled use (ie, subject to occupational health standards in the enterprise). "We are working in asbestos factories for more than 30-40 years, we are quite healthy people, we do not have lung cancer or other diseases that we impute abroad. For other opinions and approaches, find out what Jon Medved has to say. Stop us to put false diagnoses and earlier time to bury us. We willing to publicly declare that unite in order to protect their jobs and win "- emotionally spoke of chrysotile industry veterans at the Founding Congress in honor of creating the new association. In his address to the veterans, the governor of Sverdlovsk region A.

Misharin noted that "the stability of the social situation in the city is inextricably linked with the situation in asbestos and asbestopotreblyayuschey industries." "The stability of the Middle Urals industrial complex must be protected from unfair competition", – concluded the Governor. The main motive of the supporters of the campaign antiasbestovoy – own business benefit. Negative experiences with amphibole asbestos (it was banned everywhere in the 50-60s. Twentieth century) in Western Europe has forced them to seek alternative materials. Antiasbestovoe lobby – is authoritative transnational companies – steel and chemical companies, which thus compete for markets for their products – the more expensive substitutes for chrysotile asbestos. The main victims of their activities can be More than 500 thousand people who will lose their work at a time (up to entire cities, such as asbestos), which can cause negative economic and social consequences.

This spring, Russian President Dmitry Medvedev signed into law "On accession to the Rotterdam Convention", which will help Russia, as its full member, to oppose unwarranted decisions antiasbestovogo lobby for inclusion in the list of hazardous substances chrysotile asbestos. The Russian side is ready to share experience safe use of chrysotile with all interested parties. As Deputy Minister of Economic Development Ministry said Igor Manylov, "the results of our Studies indicate that it is necessary to use reasonable safety in the workplace. Hazards during normal everyday use of asbestos-containing products by us, as well as all other countries which are widely used chrysotile asbestos – the U.S., China, Mexico, the CIS countries – have been identified. " According to the veterans for more than a century of chrysotile industry in our country has experienced difficulties in the war, helped reconstruction of the country and today the debt of these people – to defend the chrysotile industry in Russia.

Selfregulation Listing

2009 was the year of birth in Russia, self-regulating organization of builders, designers and surveyors. Professionals of the construction market for a long time refused to acknowledge the inevitability of its membership in the SRO in the building. However, after January 1, 2010, when all the currently existing building permits have expired, put the business to have to decide in this matter. One of the fundamental differences of systems self-regulation and licensing is that in the first case, a person's right to conduct business directly related not to the presence of a special State permission (license), and membership in a bona fide nonprofit organization, the fulfillment of all requirements for an organization to its members. Ideally, self-regulation suggests the involvement of all professional participants market in the process of forming for ourselves civilized working conditions.

2009 was a transition from a licensing system to a system of self-construction. Participants had the opportunity of the construction market join as a SRO in the building – which has the appropriate legal status of non-profit organization and a commercial partnership (hereinafter – NP, established under the goals of SRO in the building), which did not have SRO status, but prepared to receive it. The legal regime of membership in the Partnership, established under the goals of SRO in the building, to a large extent different from the mode of membership in the non-profit partnership, which has the status of SRO in the building. Order admission to the SRO in the building, the rights and duties of the partnership, as well as the grounds and procedure for termination of membership in the partnership defined in the rules of the Law on Non-Profit Organizations and internal documents partnership. The law allows non-profit partnership to seek a candidate as a wide range of documents and information about its business. The reception may be denied to persons, if they do not submit such documents or if the content of the documents they submitted to the partnership is in doubt the reliability of information contained in them, or for other reasons laid down by internal documents organization or the decision of its competent authorities. A fundamentally different procedure for admission to the law set for SROs in the construction (see Art. 55.6 Development Code (GSC) of the RF). Imperatively defined: a comprehensive list of documents that a candidate is for admission to the SRO, an exhaustive list of grounds for denial of admission to the SRO in the construction, timing and procedure for the application of the candidate for membership SRO and the decision by the authorized body SRO. Legislative goal is to minimize the potential tyranny of the self-regulatory organization with membership in the SRO in the building and to avoid thus establishing unnecessary barriers to entry for companies building the market and, consequently, its monopolization of certain groups of people.